Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Want Me To Post?

Then get me angry. Callimachus has just such a post on the International Red Cross.

Just a reminder that the same International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) that is so aghast over America's "war crimes" knew about the Nazi atrocities during World War II and essentially did nothing, allowing itself to be fooled by transparent ruses and official denials.

It knew about the concentration camps as early as 1942. In February 1945, the President of the Red Cross wrote to a U.S. official: "Concerning the Jewish problem in Germany we are in close and continual contact with the German authorities." How chilling that the ICRC pretended to care about the Holocaust while in the same sentences adopting Nazi phraseology ("the Jewish problem") to euphemize it.

The Red Cross also knew about crimes against POWs...

A ICRC report on Stalag IX-B noted the same segregation, but the report said "no other discrimination was made against them." No, indeed, unless you count the Jewish-Americans -- along with about 330 non-Jews -- being sent to a slave labor camp associated with Buchenwald, where American POWs died at a higher rate than they would anywhere else during the war.

But Gitmo, now that's a war crime!
Not a single penny from me (and I will seek to convince those close to me) will go to the International Red Cross or any of its chapters. They obviously haven't changed an iota: once water-carriers for genocidists, always their water-carriers. Scum.

UPDATE

More of the same, this time from Amnesty International.

UPDATE THE SECOND

Just for "joey," here's more on Amnesty International. And still more.

And looky here! Even the vaunted Left is drawing similar conclusions.

David at Cronaca puts it well:
It doesn't take any particular political slant to be concerned about what is going on in Guantanamo, Afghanistan, and Iraq. But at the same time, it should be obvious that these are cases of military detention, the byproduct of actual shooting warfare -- despite the Amnesty report's constant attempts to scare quote this fact away. There may be some ugly stuff going on, but excesses in war are fundamentally different from abuses of power in times of peace.

The labeling of Guantanamo as "the gulag of our time" shows just how far Amnesty has lost its compass. Compare Guantanamo to Colditz or Andersonville or Hoa Lo, if you will; the Soviet comparison is as obscene as if the referent had been the Holocaust. And if Amnesty's obsession with indicting the USA has led it to trivialize the worst crimes of the 20th century, we shouldn't be surprised to see it similarly diverted from giving due weight to the worst of the 21st.
Comments:
Heh. Nice.

Condemn the conclusion, ignore the content...
 
You're one to talk. You went on wild tangents regarding the "gulag" comment, which i said nothing about. Nice try to derail the conversation.

Ahem. "Tangent"? "[You] said nothing about..."? Look at the structure of the post again. The first link (after updating) is to varifrank, who is explicitly discussing the Amnesty International "gulag" comment, which is so similar in content and tone to the ICRC issue that I included it in the update, after which you raised your objection. Hence, I can assume (perhaps incorrectly, but then a writer should be able to ask that a reader read everything, no?) you have read the posts to which I've pointed, and have taken them fully into consideration - therefore, 1) they aren't tangents, and 2) it doesn't matter if you never mentioned 'gulag's, because it was of primary concern in the linked posts (which I was assuming you had read - though I see now that I was incorrect in that assumption).

Oh, btw- it's not good to comdemn humanitarian organizations as "scum", regardless of what your personal political beliefs are. I guarentee they have done more to attempt to alleviate human suffering and deal with crises than you have ever done.

Heh heh. Lecture me all you want on morality and charity, please. I'm content to laugh at you for the next few minutes.

Whatever irrellevant ad hominem you'd like to drag, kicking and screaming, into this discussion, the fact remains - they did and do coddle dictators and excuse genocidists. I don't know what your code of morality is, but under mine, that earns them the title I previously bestowed.

As for the concentration camp argument: a few points and maybe some history lessons for you...

*Clears Throat* "BOO BOO BLAH BLOO." There. How'd I do? DId I meet your expectations?

Prior to the Nuremberg Trials and the body of law that came out of it, the International Red Cross committed itself to remaining a non-partisian and neutral observer...

*Looks at his watch*
Teacher, can I go to the bathroom?

Secondly, though the Red Cross was aware of German concentration camps...

You know, I'm really interested in your explorations of moral equivalence - no really, I am - but, well, I'm going to go over here and do something interesting for the next few moments. Like pick the wings off a fly.

Most mass murders (though starvation, disease and other horrors such as medical experiments took place, in addition to murders and executions) did not take place in these camps, but in field operations...

*Yawn*

Are we there yet?

Concentration camps had been operating since the early 1930s and were fairly common knowledge to government officials and aid agencies...

No, I'm not sleeping. I'm just resting my eyes. Wake me when you're done.

Furthermore, since...

*Snnnkkkkkkkkaaaaaccckkkk*
*rrrrrrrRRRRRrrrrrr*
*SSssssnnnnkkkkaaaaaaccckkkkk*

They knew that war crimes were being committed on a large scale...The discovery of the Holocaust...Nuremberg illustrated that...That is why Amnesty...

*SSSkkkkkuuuuuuuckkkk-wheeeeeeee*
*SSSkkkkkuuuuuuuckkkk-wheeeeeeee*

... people who MAY HAVE DONE NOTHING AT ALL.

AAAAHH!!! What? Where? Who? What's the yelling? Why?

Does that make Amnesty International bad? or does a humanitarian/human rights agency secretly want to install a group of relgious fascists to lord over us all?

Ummm...yes? Or no? Maybe? What was the question again?

As for the gulag comment, it may have been in bad taste, but you know what? At least the people who suffered under Stalin got a show trial before they were sentenced AS OPPOSED TO NOTHING AT ALL.

Ooh, ooh! I know this one! I do...there! I even own that one. It's a big book, too. Nice and impressive looking. And the funny thing is, it's supposed to be read. Imagine that! A book that one might actually read!

I'm sorry, did you say something of import while I was asleep? Something you wanted to discuss?

Huh. 'Cuz all I heard was "I'm going to be extremely condescending now, and assume that you are a five year old just starting grade school." I figured I'd better act the part - I didn't want to hurt your feelings.

Lecture all you want, monsieur. Just don't expect me to listen. Come back when you're ready to engage in a discussion between equals.
 
Anything they do at Gitmo is not going to be as bad as Sadam did to his own people or the Germans did in there camps. It's too bad that this is all getting blown out of perspective.
I'm a native Texas from Houston. It's hot and sticky down here.
 
I can understand your anger. I can relate with you too. Even I need to be angry in order to blog :)

This is Nancy from Israeli Uncensored News
 
Post a Comment

A webjournal of ideas, comments, and various other miscellany from a Texan university student (with occasional input from his family) living in Toronto, Ontario. Can you say "culture shock?"

Enter your email address below to subscribe to The Transplanted Texan!

powered by Bloglet

< ? Texas Blogs # >
Entertainment Center

Solidaridad
"Con las víctimas, con la Constitución, por la derrota del terrorismo"

Search

The Transplanted Texan
The Web

Current Mood:



Latest Music On iTunes

Site Feed

Thoughts

On Truth
A Clarification On Media Bias
A Bit Of An Issue
[Defending My Position]
Canada And Cynicism
Inauthentic Authenticity
Conspiracy Theories
Conspiracy Theories, Redux
Musings

On 9/11 And Terror
Monochromatic Thinking
A Day Worth Remembering

On Politics And Public Issues
The Art Of Listening
The American System
A Clarification On Media Bias
Pleasure
A Bit Of An Issue
Little Longer Than Expected
Speaking For All Of Us?

On Poetry
Spirit
Counteract
Virus
Something I've Been Meaning To Do

(Some Of) What I Read:

Friends & Family

Canadiana

BlogRoll

Archives

Blog Links

Listed on BlogsCanada Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com
Listed on Blogwise

Subscribe with Bloglines